Comments
Digital copy of Attorney General v. Young and Williams 1998 [1998 UR 58]. Taken from British and Irish Legal Information Institute on 24 July 2014. Used by Dr Philip Michael Johnson in his witness statement to the Inquiry dated 25 July 2014 [ZC/D/AW6/A/EE000035].
Reference | ZC/D/AW6/A/EE000002 |
Date | 24 March 1998 |
Scope and Content | Relates to the unreported judgement of the Royal Court concerning defendants Robert John Young and Alfred George Williams. Each defendant is charged with counts of inducement to take part in arrangements with respect to the management of property by statements known to be misleading, false, or deceptive. Proceedings presided over by a Judge of the Jersey Court of Appeal, Sir Godfray Le Quesne, Commissioner, and Jurats [Michael Arthur] Rumfitt and [John Claude] Tibbo. Representation: Crown Advocate C E Whelan for the Crown, Advocate D F Le Quesne for R J Young and Advocate S Young for A G Williams. |
Names | Johnson, Philip Michael, Dr Le Quesne, D F, Advocate Le Quesne, Sir Godfray Rumfitt, Michael Arthur, Jurat Tibbo, John Claude, Jurat Whelan, Cyril Edward Williams, Alfred George Young, Robert John Young, S, Advocate British and Irish Legal Information Institute Royal Court |
Keywords | experts | evidence | commissioners | Jurats | Royal Court | Attorneys General | Judges | unreported judgements |
Places | Jersey |
Dimensions | 1 pdf file |
Language | English |
Level of description | File |
Access restrictions | PDF file - please click on the link to download |
Closed until | 2100 |
Context:
Digital copy of Attorney General v. Young and Williams 1998 [1998 UR 58]. Taken from British and Irish Legal Information Institute on 24 July 2014. Used by Dr Philip Michael Johnson in his witness statement to the Inquiry dated 25 July 2014 [ZC/D/AW6/A/EE000035].
ZC/D/AW6/A/EE000002
A digital image is available to view online or this item is closed because it is exempt from public access under the Freedom of Information Law. If you would like to make a request please email us.