Comments

Digital copy of Attorney General v. Young and Williams 1998 [1998 UR 58]. Taken from British and Irish Legal Information Institute on 24 July 2014. Used by Dr Philip Michael Johnson in his witness statement to the Inquiry dated 25 July 2014 [C/D/AW6/A/EE000035].

View EE000002.pdf | Download EE000002.pdf

Reference

C/D/AW6/A/EE000002

Date

March 24th 1998 - March 24th 1998

Scope and Content

Relates to the unreported judgement of the Royal Court concerning defendants Robert John Young and Alfred George Williams. Each defendant is charged with counts of inducement to take part in arrangements with respect to the management of property by statements known to be misleading, false, or deceptive. Proceedings presided over by a Judge of the Jersey Court of Appeal, Sir Godfray Le Quesne, Commissioner, and Jurats [Michael Arthur] Rumfitt and [John Claude] Tibbo. Representation: Crown Advocate C E Whelan for the Crown, Advocate D F Le Quesne for R J Young and Advocate S Young for A G Williams.

Names

Johnson, Philip Michael, Dr
Le Quesne, D F, Advocate
Le Quesne, Sir Godfray
Rumfitt, Michael Arthur, Jurat
Tibbo, John Claude, Jurat
Whelan, Cyril Edward
Williams, Alfred George
Young, Robert John
Young, S, Advocate
British and Irish Legal Information Institute
Royal Court

Keywords

Jersey | experts | evidence | commissioners | Jurats | Royal Court | Attorneys General | Judges | unreported judgements

Dimensions

1 pdf file

Language

English

Level of description

file

Access Restriction

PDF file - please click on the link to download

Closed until

2100

Context:

C/D/AW6/A/EE000002This item»
Search query time: 0 seconds • Page build time: 0.01482001543045 seconds